1) Read the section "People and History" from Worksheet # 4. Analyze both characters, Yamamoto Isoroku and Kanno Sugako. Write a journal entry comparing and contrasting both characters, and their fates. Conclude your entry with the answer to this question, "Was it fair"?

 To start with this comparative text, we need to know on a more personal level that these two people were of Japanese origin and lived when the imperial office still exists in their country. On the one hand, Yamamoto Isoroku was a Japanese marin wounded in the battle of Tsushima, and then he became one of the managers of the attack on the Harbor Pearl, on the other hand, Kanno Sugako was a woman with the socialist ideal and feminists resisting the war of that time. She wrote several articles in which she criticized the situation of women in Japan in 1911, while she looked at them in a state of slavery because she criticized from her texts that women in Japan were considered an object and had no freedom. . Due to an "invisible" essence, it refers to the authority of the Emperor. She decided to kill the emperor of that time, since she has never been taken into account and has always been written with these ideals, but a person announced it for her attempt to kill against the Emperor and become an Assassination attempt.

 

 Kanno Sugako's situation was unfair in one respect and fair in another respect. It was unfair because he only wanted women to make freedom and not be in a state of slavery, he only used freedom of expression as a means to know the situation in his country and change in any way, but all change them have the Silence that brought. For these ideals. On the other hand, her while she was trying to kill the emperor of that time, that is, she decided to kill an important and influential person at that time. It was precisely that she gave him the death penalty because she had committed treason. . In Yamamoto Isoroku's case, he doesn't say much about what happened, but his situation was unfair because he killed innocents and never received a fee and got no cost. If we compare the two cases, Yamamoto Isoroku was an unfair situation in relation to that of Kanno Sugako, who expressed only the truth.