3) An Invasion or an Incident? The occupation of Manchuria in 1931 was considered by the Japanese as an "Incident", and as an "Invasion" by the historians. Imagine that you are an Irish reporter. Choose one of these terms to write a report about what happened in Manchuria. Your report will be published on "The Irish Observer".

As we know, the 1931 Manchuria occupation came to a Mukdens accident when it appeared on September 19, 1931 and took until WWII. But what concept is the best to define this incident? Invasion or accident? Everyone can define this accident according to their interpretation, but for me, I think I think that an invasion of Japan has decided to build the exploitation of its power, leading to the invasion of Manchuria. What do I want to explain with that? What I meant is that when the Japanese have decided to expand the operation of their force in this area, in this area that was not under them, to start and do what they are the best in this territory that is the best of one of the others. The force, which orders another force is another force, an invasion, an invasion that can be defined as a military operation in which the forces of a country or a country or a particular territory with their force, in another country or other authorization, without any authorization. Give permission and do what they want when they give it the best for their country. This definition is exactly what Japan did after the Mukden accident, so I think "the invasion" and not as an "accident" as Japanese says.